It just
ocurred to me that I live the ‘ifs’
with as much intensity as reality. When they have come dangerously close from
becoming so, I elope towards my center. I wonder if it’s just me.
I thought
about it while listening to Tears in the
Rain, by Joe Satriani. This song
was played to me by a dear friend of mine. He did dare to turn an idea into
reality. I think I loved him because of that, but that’s way off point. That’s
a thought to ponder.
It seems to
me that I relate people to the things they give me, whether it be music, image
or thought. Again, I wonder if it’s just me. I read life’s symbols and put two
and two together to understand, people,
not symbols. I’m pretty clear on symbols.
It’s
probable and possible that people have nothing to do at all with the way I see
them, in which case, I would be basing my assumptions on a very thin layer.
Are there
any ways in which I can measure my assertions versus my misjudgments?
I believe
it’s a matter of personal linguistics. The voices speaking in my head, the
different voices of thought, use different terms for different things.
Sometimes I think I know something using those words; sometimes I don’t need to
use the words to know. I trust the latter.
A poet
would say I trust silence.
A shrink
would say that I have an issue with trust due to the particular aspects of my
childhood. He’d probably be right, but it’s a fruitless thought once you know.
And who
would go for something so prosaic?
I have the
theory that human race had a before and after the concept of “mistake”. Animals
make no mistakes, mishaps happen to them, like a branch braking, causing a
monkey to fall while jumping from tree to tree. Mistake requires judgment.
Judgment requires a preexisting sense of logic.
They say
man shall be judged by his equals. It means, in discursive terms, by himself.
In the same way that religions tell us that god made us in his image and
likeness, and that translates into us studying the existence of god as to an
important part of knowing ourselves, the divine in us; in this way a man our
equal is ourselves.
Guilt is
self imposed. It’s based also on our particular sense of logic. It means that,
if I ever think I’m frowned upon by society when doing something, anything that
society might frown upon, it’s actually a show of the superego.
I don’t
pretend to go as far as assuming that society is only an expression of our
unconscious. I believe reality exists because I can touch it, and because there
is no other alternative (if I pull the plug on myself, the other side is blank,
simply because, like god, it is completely out of my capacity).
So is
society as well, so complex that it’s away from your capacity of understanding,
society is also the expression of individuals in a macro level. We are not yet
a globalized planet, we are only a planet the size of a country.
I have been
studying about the concept of culture and the myriad of things that surround
it. I can’t believe how this particular two teachers do the works. One of them
is male, hard tempered. Judging (logic again) by the way he looks at me I can
tell he doesn’t think much. That’s good, the other one can’t stop noticing me
and that annoys me. He sees culture as a list, movies, books, paintings,
architecture and such. He thinks the state must help but not interfere. Where I
come from, you call that a bank. Help means money, equipment, personnel and/or
permission. Artists have thrived in the places where Philanthropy has existed,
in the shape of private parties or public leaders. In fewer words, if Homer
hadn’t been entertained and cared for by a high member of society, the Iliad
and the Odyssey would not have existed.
But that’s
artists, not culture.
Culture
thrives in self dependent societies, who move together in small environments.
That is why we talk of urban culture and tribal culture. Things that are
cultivated in the environment of cities and tribes.
That’s what
culture means. I believe, and I would fight to prove, that all the other stupid
socially challenged concepts for culture, which are utilitarian to the economic
factors within the rising “culture market”, are a bit far off track.
In basic
terms, that’s what I assume as culture.
What are
the consequences of that assumption?
First, the
numbers: what are the things that are cultivated in Venezuela? Chocolate,
coffee, oil, (I don’t dare say women yet, that’s more profound) and small
business.
I dare
assume also, that artists can be cultivated too. Artists comprise music,
plastic arts, words and body expression (must check if I missed out on any). So
the correct policy, “cultural policy” at that, is to cultivate artists, in the
same way that China has cultivated tea. How do you cultivate artists? Through
education.
Sport is
also a culture, if you don’t believe me, ask the Greeks. Can anyone tell me
that the Olympics are not a cultural practice? How nice of them to have
expanded out of their original location and settled profoundly east and west of
the earth. It took money to cultivate them too.
To follow
the planting paradigm, ideology injected into the cultivated area will depend
on who holds control of the water tab.
There is of
course the need for “diffusion”, but it’s not as if we had to spend all the
money there. That is actually the cheapest part of the process. Having good
content on the TV, a few websites, banners, flags, street expositions, communal
museums, communal art galleries, radio shows… That’s easy.
And then
there is the keyword: appropriation. It means in colloquial terms, god creates
them and then they pair. You don’t really know what’s gonna happen. However, it
is logical and right.
So if I
ever publish this, and its read, and thought correct, I’d smile, wherever I am.
Which
brings me to my next point. What should we cultivate?
Maybe
Utopia is where we go when we die. We go to the world of ideas, and the ideas
that exist, for me, are the ones that I know.
If a person
doesn’t work into producing his ideas while he lives, he will probably feel a
sense of loss when he dies. I rather feel a sense of gain.
You don’t
need to read too much philosophy to understand what its conclusion has been
and continues to be; the same one Socrates reached a couple of centuries ago,
we know nothing, except whatever knowledge natural laws have provided for us,
the rules of reality, things fall downwards.
I don’t go
as far as to agree with Erich Fromm and his theory on social pathology, I
believe society is not sick, but there is an artificial, unnatural, growth on
it that makes her dysfunctional. Much like cancer, it can be cured or prevented
by the simple principle of do not harm, and through the belief that the human
body can heal itself, as well as society can. There are only so many eyes
Talion can claim for himself before people stop paying tribute.
Since we
are at this, I also believe that men and women may not have the same way of
thinking, but they are the same being, in two different expressions which
complement each other. Both have equal rights to be free, that’s why I find it
stupid when someone blurts out that women should be treated equally by men, or
that women should be strong and work, mind the house, mind the children and
look healthy and thriving during the whole time. If you wish to, by all means
do it. But if no one is out there saying that men should be strong, and that
men should be excellent in bed as well as intelligent, sensitive, caring, funny
and interesting and mysterious and challenging and… Breathe…
No, the
answer is no. Neither men nor women should be anything other than what they
wish to be. And by wish I don’t mean “I wish to be an astronaut when I grow
up”. That concept is made of the silences I speak of, the fulfillment of self
that needs no word to be accomplished within my person. One thing is to desire
to become a person who heals animals and another one is to wish to be a
veterinary, simply because bureaucracy has turned it into a nine-to-five job
with paperwork and a fake sense of obligation.
When I was
little I wished to be a philosopher, just for the echo it made in my head. Then
I wanted to be an archeologist, because I wanted to dig and find treasures. At
some point I wanted to be a journalist, because I wanted to go places and show the
world what was going on there. None of these desires has anything to do with
the real experience in the day to day practice.
Maybe I think too fast? I just
swallowed whole a book on philosophy; I felt the need to catch up on something.
I have been meeting people from too many different places and trains of
thought, my values have been questioned over and over. I needed some base.
I wanted to
be a lawyer because it seemed wide enough a field for me to move around. I was
proved right. It’s so wide I have no idea where to land. Maybe I don’t want to
land on anything? I’m afraid that, in the process of one thing leading to
another, I’ll end up believing that aliens speak to me and tell me to burn things. (They don't).
If I dare
go spiritual, I must base my thoughts on Credo
Quia Absurdum. If I try to understand divinity through reason I’d be
shooting in the wrong direction. Divinity is personal, kudos to philosophy on
teaching us that; kudos to religion for teaching us the discipline and keeping
the spirit.
We must
speak in order to know ourselves, but we must be careful with words, they are
deceitful. Sounds, however, are not, neither are silences. They cannot be
tainted by the colors of languages, however beautiful they may be.
Then there
is the question of relevance. What do we talk about?
I feel
guilty, for example, because I let myself go around certain feelings and
emotions. But I’m only human, and human means I am subject to certain aspects
of my personality. I do not wish to change it, not all of it, only the things I
don’t like, and even then I tremble at the consequences. I restrain myself from
listening to music or reading books, because I believe it can lead me through
dangerous paths. But sometimes I just can’t help it. I’m weak when it comes to
certain things, aren’t we all? I don’t believe it to be wrong, I believe it to
be human.
Greek gods
sprung from within the earth, for the regular people. Zeus only helped the
strongest, the common citizen is not so, he is only equal to everyone in Hades,
Demeter and Poseidon, in Orpheus and Persephone.
Christianity
then erased the subtle differences among men, and through the middle ages
people gave cult to the devil.
I believe
that my random steps are being guided, they are only random to my limited
understanding. I sense a bigger picture, even though I cannot see it. Sensing
goes beyond the five senses and into the infinite silence that fills the
universe.
D.